TRANSLATE THIS SITE

HOME  •  ARTICLES  •  RESOURCES  •  NEWS  •  LINKS  •  SUBSCRIBE  •  ABOUT HAZARDS

PO BOX 199   SHEFFIELD   S1 4YL   ENGLAND         WWW.HAZARDS.ORG       


SICKNESS ABSENCE

 


 







 
SICKNESS ABSENCE: PRE EMPLOYMENT SCREENING

The Hazards test test

1. Can the job be adapted so that health problems identified by testing would not be relevant?
The UK Civil Service medical agency calls for the referral of job hopefuls with any one of 55 ailments - including arthritis, depression, asthma and chronic bronchitis - for pre-employment medical assessment. But some firms do perfectly well without any screening, so could the service's real interest be justifying its own job?

2. Are there staff competent to introduce changes to accommodate workers with disabilities or particular health needs?
This is now a legal requirement in Sweden. Disability campaign group RADAR points out that compulsory medical screening for teachers used to make no attempt "to determine the practical ability to teach, given appropriate aids and adaptation."

3. Could good safety practice remove the need for the test?
Frequently the screening is being used to avoid potential compensation claims which should not arise if ergonomic changes are made.

4. Are the screening tests used relevant?
US law outlaws screening prior to a job offer, so candidates are assessed primarily on their ability, not disability.

5. Were applicants told the purpose of the tests?
UNISON members on Southwark council were asked to say whether a series of statements applied to them, including: "I am not afraid of picking up disease from door knobs" and "I like tall women", a procedure an ex-chief psychologist to the civil service described as an "ethical minefield" and "bound to go haywire".19 workers were sacked on the basis of these tests.

6. Do the tests give sound results?
At a meeting organised by the European Trade Union Technical Bureau a UK chest specialist pointed out that because tests for atopy (a tendency to become allergic to substances) are insensitive and not specific, to prevent one extra case of allergy to lab animals in a group of 100 laboratory workers it would be necessary to eliminate 16 applicants.

7. Are tests carried out by someone competent?
In the UK only 10% of those carrying out psychological tests are recognised by the British Psychological Society as competent to do so.

8. Do job applicants have a right of access to medical/screening reports?
Medical reports provided by a hospital or family doctor to your employer are covered by the Access to Medical Reports Act, which give workers the right to see and propose amendments. But a legal loophole means that reports prepared by a doctor acting for your (potential) employer are not covered.


HAZARDS MAGAZINE   •  WORKERS' HEALTH INTERNATIONAL NEWS